Code Quality

The reality of long-term software maintenance from the maintainer's perspective ★★★★★

Long-term software maintenance involves significantly more work than initial development, with maintenance accounting for approximately 75% of a feature's total lifecycle effort. The challenges of maintaining large codebases include dealing with software rot, backwards compatibility, and managing external contributions, which many developers underestimate. Maintaining software parallels building maintenance, where initial construction represents only a fraction of the long-term responsibility.

Theodore Ts'o

The email discusses the role and challenges of Linux kernel maintainers, emphasizing that their power is limited to rejecting code rather than commanding development. A key point is made about the importance of becoming part of the community and building trust, particularly for teams wanting to introduce potentially disruptive features like Rust support.

<antirez>

Modern software development practices are deteriorating due to overcomplication, excessive dependencies, and disregard for fundamental principles. The industry's focus on rapid development, constant rewrites, and complex frameworks is undermining software quality and sustainability. This approach diminishes the learning experience for new programmers and threatens the joy of programming.

Best Simple System for Now

A balanced approach to software development, called 'Best Simple System for Now' (BSSN), advocates building the simplest possible solution that meets current needs while maintaining high code quality. The philosophy emphasizes writing code that is neither over-engineered nor under-developed, focusing on immediate requirements rather than speculative future needs. BSSN promotes evolutionary design through disciplined habits, courage, and humility, enabling faster delivery while maintaining code quality.