renzume.
2025-01-21

Broken OBS Studio Flatpak presented as official package (#39) · Issues · fedora / Special Interest Groups (SIGs) / Fedora Flatpak SIG / Fedora Flatpaks · GitLab

A problematic unofficial OBS Studio Flatpak package in Fedora is causing confusion and frustration among users who mistake it for the official release. The situation highlights broader issues with Fedora Flatpaks' distribution and opt-out mechanisms, while potentially undermining the extensive work put into official Flathub releases.

Original archive.is archive.ph web.archive.org

Log in to get one-click access to archived versions of this article.

read comments on news aggregators:

Related articles

A year of uv: pros, cons, and should you migrate

A comprehensive review of uv, a Python project management tool by Astral, highlighting its efficiency, reliability, and cross-platform capabilities after one year of extensive testing. The tool excels in Python bootstrapping, dependency management, and project initialization while addressing common pain points in the Python ecosystem.

Persistent packages on Steam Deck using Nix

A guide explains how to install and manage persistent packages on Steam Deck using Nix and Home Manager, overcoming SteamOS's immutable filesystem limitations. The solution leverages Nix's declarative package management system and /nix directory preservation during system updates, enabling permanent software installations across system upgrades.

a tale of several distros joining forces for a common goal

A collaborative effort between Debian and Arch Linux developers showcases their work on reproducible builds using rebuilderd, a tool implemented since 2020 for Arch and 2024 for Debian, to verify package integrity across distributions.

I'm done with Ubuntu

A former Ubuntu user explains their transition to Fedora due to persistent upgrade issues and frustrations with Ubuntu's Snap package management system, highlighting how forced Snap implementations have degraded user experience and productivity.